<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the UK&#8217;s DNA Database, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.genetic-inference.co.uk/blog/2009/05/on-the-uks-dna-database-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.genetic-inference.co.uk/blog/2009/05/on-the-uks-dna-database-part-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:21:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.genetic-inference.co.uk/blog/2009/05/on-the-uks-dna-database-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genetic-inference.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-299</guid>
		<description>So, for things like trisomy you&#039;d probably just get too many peaks, and the reading would be dismissed (filed as a Partial Profile).

Chemerism is more tricky; by default, they don&#039;t test for it (as they only take one tissue type), so only one genotype would go on the database: that does leave the potential for false negatives. If they did get a confirmed chimera, I doubt they&#039;d have a way of storing that on the database without just creating one entry for each profile. 

However, I&#039;d have thought that chimerism is so rare that it isn&#039;t worth having a specific plan for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, for things like trisomy you&#8217;d probably just get too many peaks, and the reading would be dismissed (filed as a Partial Profile).</p>
<p>Chemerism is more tricky; by default, they don&#8217;t test for it (as they only take one tissue type), so only one genotype would go on the database: that does leave the potential for false negatives. If they did get a confirmed chimera, I doubt they&#8217;d have a way of storing that on the database without just creating one entry for each profile. </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;d have thought that chimerism is so rare that it isn&#8217;t worth having a specific plan for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhan</title>
		<link>http://www.genetic-inference.co.uk/blog/2009/05/on-the-uks-dna-database-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genetic-inference.co.uk/blog/?p=379#comment-298</guid>
		<description>One thing that piques my interest is how the database might handle chimeric individuals. I&#039;m guessing trisomies and other irregularities wouldn&#039;t have such a noticeable effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that piques my interest is how the database might handle chimeric individuals. I&#8217;m guessing trisomies and other irregularities wouldn&#8217;t have such a noticeable effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
